por Isabella Radd
According
to the United Nations Charter, one of The UN Security Council’s job is to guarantee world peace. However, there is another important principle: The UN is not
allowed to interfere in any internal politics of a nation.
The UN Security
Council’s permanent members – The United States, The United Kingdom, France,
Russia, and China – are the ones which have the veto power, and are exactly those which
also have nuclear weapons. While nothing has been proven about the military purposes of
Iran’s uranium-enrichment program, and permanent members have nuclear weapons,
there is no logical explanation to support interferences or judgement of The UN
Security Council, whose sanctions are applied only based on assumptions.
Sanctions
are not the best way to be successful in negotiations with Iran’s government; instead, the UN should invest in diplomatic talks. More than once, Iran’s
president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, refused to negociate under threats of
sanctions. In spite of this, he showed willing when countries like Brazil and
Turkey offered their diplomacy to intermediate agreements involving the exchange of low-enriched uranium for this high- enriched metal.
Investments in uranium-enrichment are surely a domestic Iranian issue, and there is reason enough for Iran to not let the IAEA inspect its territory or feel obliged
to show details about its nuclear program. Enriched uranium can be clearly used
to make nuclear weapons, but this material also has many other peaceful uses,
like being an important generator of electricity or helping in medical purposes,
including some cancer treatments. In this manner, as it is a domestic policy, Iran’s
uranium-enrichment program cannot be prohibited by any international
organization, especially considering UN purposes of laissez-faire in national domestic affairs and Iran’s sovereignty. Moreover, attempting to preserve it, Iran
has refused to sign The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
In fact, The UN
Security Council should not interfere in Iran’s nuclear issues, as permanent
members do not have legitimacy to judge a country which has nothing proved
against it, while they indoubtedly have nuclear weapons.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Você precisa ter uma conta Google para comentar postagens desse blog.
Conta Google é uma conta no Gmail, Orkut, Youtube, Google+... Qualquer delas serve. Faça o login e pronto!
Obrigada por acompanhar!
Volte sempre!!! :)